One cite resolves from the local snapshot; the other cannot be checked without live data, so it reads as uncheckable -- not missing, not wrong. Degradation with its reason stated.
2 citations found, 0 quotes found
Data snapshot fixture-corpus (not the live public corpus) (world frozen then; cases decided after need recheck). Run 2026-10-17T11:45:01+00:00. Record fc4d756d28a3.
Record fc4d756d28a3 · checked 2026-10-17T11:45:01+00:00
Public-record snapshot: fixture-corpus (not the live public corpus)
Brief SHA-256: c9c2f5e3a60ecc9154b2bfdc7492f59b4d7bbd016d5af1b28fb3b48a46e1fee7
Matched a location in the public record. Existence-only rows state so beside the badge; full quote comparison is paid.
Case name and year match the cited case.
Resolved to Roe v. Wade U.S. 1973-01-22
Good law: not checked — open citing history below. Shepardize/KeyCite before filing.
No quoted passage was attached, so this confirms existence and case identity only.
Not checked. These are not clearances — verify them yourself.
Not checked: no public-records lookup is configured.
Publication check (consistent): Reporter, volume and year fit the publication history of Federal Reporter, 3d. This is not verification -- the citation still needs a manual check, it just shows no publication-history red flags.
Still good law? We don't decide that: the groups below open citing-history searches for the named case, never a verdict. Lexis/Westlaw subscribers: Shepardize or KeyCite the citation there. No free search replaces that check.
Citing history: Roe v. Wade
This record verifies citation existence and quote accuracy against public court records. It does not verify that cited authority supports the proposition for which it is cited, nor whether the authority remains good law. It does not detect all possible citation errors. Attorney review required under Rule 11.