CiteProof / Products

Canadian cases, checked.

CiteProof verifies Canadian citations — neutral cites like 2016 SCC 27 for existence and identity against CanLII, the Canadian Legal Information Institute's public collection. Supreme Court Reports cites like [2008] 1 SCR 190 surface as named-but-unverified while the reports path is contained. Same credit, same report, limits stated on the row.

Canadian verification is live on this instance: Canadian rows resolve against CanLII.
Canadian reports-citation checking is temporarily unavailable. Supreme Court Reports cites (like [2008] 1 SCR 190) surface as named-but-unverified rows while the reports path is contained; supported neutral citations can still be checked.

What it checks

  • Existence. The cited decision is in CanLII's collection — verified by record, not by ranking.
  • Identity. The party names in your brief are compared against the decision's title, the same identity check U.S. cases get. A mismatch flags; a missing name leaves identity unjudged rather than guessed.
  • Cite forms. Neutral cites (2014 ONCA 925) resolve directly. Supreme Court Reports cites ([2008] 1 SCR 190) are temporarily unavailable as automatic checks: they surface preserved but unverified. A neutral plus SCR pair for one decision keeps each row's own finding and says so on both rows.

What it does not

  • Quoted passages are not compared. CanLII's API serves metadata, and CiteProof does not scrape decision pages — so quoted lines on Canadian rows stay uncompared, marked as a corpus gap, and a quoted Canadian row reads needs-review rather than clean.
  • Courts outside the checked set are named, never verified. A cite the set does not cover surfaces as a named row with the court stated, never as a guess.
  • Everything else from the main limits. No good law, no support-for-proposition, no currency or interpretation — attorney review is still required, and Rule 11 diligence belongs to the filing lawyer.

Coverage

The checked set today — Supreme Court, appellate and superior trial courts, and the federal courts:

  • Court Martial Appeal Court of Canada
  • Court of Appeal for British Columbia
  • Court of Appeal for Ontario
  • Court of Appeal for Saskatchewan
  • Court of Appeal for the Northwest Territories
  • Court of Appeal of Alberta
  • Court of Appeal of Manitoba
  • Court of Appeal of New Brunswick
  • Court of Appeal of Newfoundland and Labrador
  • Court of Appeal of Nunavut
  • Court of Appeal of Prince Edward Island
  • Court of Appeal of Quebec
  • Court of Appeal of Yukon
  • Court of King's Bench for Saskatchewan
  • Court of King's Bench of Alberta
  • Court of King's Bench of Manitoba
  • Court of King's Bench of New Brunswick
  • Court of Quebec
  • Federal Court
  • Federal Court of Appeal
  • Nova Scotia Court of Appeal
  • Nunavut Court of Justice
  • Ontario Court of Justice
  • Ontario Superior Court of Justice
  • Superior Court of Quebec
  • Supreme Court of British Columbia
  • Supreme Court of Canada
  • Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador (Trial Division)
  • Supreme Court of Nova Scotia
  • Supreme Court of Prince Edward Island
  • Supreme Court of Yukon
  • Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories
  • Tax Court of Canada

The set is a table, not a promise about CanLII's holdings: verification confirms the cited decision is there, never the completeness of any court's archive. Expanding the set is a table edit plus tests.

How to use it

  1. Paste a Canadian brief at Citation Check — one credit per check, same packs, same subscriptions. See pricing.
  2. Drive it programmatically through the API — same endpoints, same per-document spend, same vendor quotas.
  3. Canadian rows carry their CanLII link on the record; uncheckable rows name the reason and the resolution path.

Check a Canadian brief API reference

CiteProof verifies citation existence and quote accuracy against public court records. It is not legal advice and does not replace attorney review. Terms · Privacy · Contact