CiteProof citation check

A real case, and a quote that does not say what the brief says

One word changed from the real opinion text. The closest passage is shown beside it.

1 citations found, 1 quotes found

  • 1 from cache
  • 0 live lookups
  • 0 opinion texts fetched
  • 1 citations checked

Data snapshot fixture-corpus (not the live public corpus). Run 2026-10-05T19:50:46+00:00. Record 233f52e10ef3.

Show

Needs attention (1)

Citations here are wrong, or right but worth reading yourself.

0 of 1 reviewed

[ REVIEW ] Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (scotus 1973) FullCaseCitation court hint scotus year hint 1973

Closest match needs review: the match changes a number or a negation; the opinion says "not" where the brief omits it.

Resolved to Roe v. Wade U.S. 1973-01-22

Still good law? We don't decide that — check what has cited this case since:

Lexis/Westlaw subscribers: Shepardize or KeyCite this citation there. No free search replaces that check.

Quote as written

the right, nonetheless, is absolute and is subject to some limitations

Closest passage in the opinion (majority) match confidence: low

e right, nonetheless, is not absolute and is subject to some limitatio
  • the match changes a number or a negation

Negation differs

not

The opinion contains not.

Similarity 94% · 1 passage fragments compared

Publication check (consistent): Reporter, volume and year fit the publication history of U.S. Reports. This is not verification -- the citation still needs a manual check, it just shows no publication-history red flags.

This record verifies citation existence and quote accuracy against public court records. It does not verify that cited authority supports the proposition for which it is cited, nor whether the authority remains good law. It does not detect all possible citation errors. Attorney review required under Rule 11.